Before, if ever, Narendra Modi becomes
prime minister, he will have to break the stranglehold of the Muslim votebank
on Indian politics. His sadbhavna
missions) to win the confidence of Muslims are good as far as they go. However,
even hundreds of such yatras will not take him even an inch closer to the
throne of India .
Hindus, and Hindus alone, can propel him to power at the Centre, if they choose
to. For BJP’s central leadership, Narendra Modi poses a dilemma: he is
viewed as a great asset and also as a great liability. Modi’s popularity
crossed the borders of Delhi Gujarat long ago. He
emerged as a national leader on the back of resolute leadership, efficient
administration and a clean image. He enjoys a good deal of support from the
RSS, which in BJP is a trump card.
With ears close to the ground, easy accessibility and a sound track record of delivering on promises, Modi has acquired a measure of credibility and charisma which none of the BJP’s central leaders possess. Shivraj Singh Chauhan of Madhya Pradesh and Raman Singh of Chhattisgarh have also earned popularity on similar strengths, but neither appears to be keen, as of now, to play a leading role at the Centre. Modi is a different case. BJP bigwigs cannot ignore him or his ambitions.
However, if Modi is selected to command BJP forces in the forthcoming Lok Sabha election, many BJP leaders will have to forget their ambitions and rein in their lust for power. The pull of such lust should not be underestimated.
These leaders want Modi to campaign for the party, not only in Gujarat, but also in other states where his presence can make a difference, while expecting him to confine his own ambitions to
Gujarat. Modi is unwilling to oblige them, unless he
could augment his own political capital by campaigning outside Gujarat. He wants to be the commander, not a foot
soldier. This subtle tug of war is slowly becoming visible and will emerge out
in the open by the time of the Lok Sabha election.
It is equally certain that if BJP selects Narendra Modi as its prime ministerial candidate, it will have to forget not only about the few (if any) Muslim votes it gets, but also about allies who are mortally scared of annoying Muslim votebanks. Therein lies the rub. Barring the Akali Dal and the Shiv Sena, all other parties in the NDA are enamoured of the ‘secular’ label. The hypocrisy of leaders like Nitish Kumar is infuriating. By insisting that the NDA candidate for prime minister must have a ‘secular’ image, he is playing to the green gallery while trying to keep a powerful rival off the field. The ploy is too transparent to be missed, but, unfortunately, it threatens to work.
Muslims are naturally amused to watch the game. In their view, their security (actually, political clout) lies in keeping out of power any party or leader who enjoys any credibility - real or fake - among the Hindus. And if Hindu leaders can articulate that position for them in as many words, so much the better.
This is a decisive moment, not just for the BJP or NDA, but for Hindu society. The modern Hindu intelligentsia has failed to grasp a basic fact: clout, influence, power or authority is central to human relations. Power that is not exercised eventually wears off and vanishes. Hindu intellectuals rarely examine any issue, development or trend in terms of Hindu influence or power. For most of them, such an exercise is weird and anti-secular if not anti-national. They think it is beneath them to indulge in it. Hindu society has paid, and continues to pay, a heavy price for this failure of its intelligentsia.
In the post-independence period, Hindus have never asserted primacy of their civilisational identity at the political level. They have never claimed to be the essential national society, the fulcrum of the polity around which every institution and organization must arrange itself. In contrast, Muslims realize the centrality of power in relations with non-Muslims. They can and do use their votes as an effective political weapon. I do not criticize Muslims for doing so, just as I do not applaud Hindus for neglecting power equations in post-independence
Hence it is that Hindus have become political orphans in the only country they can call their own. Hence it is they are still maligned for
Gujarat riots ten years
after the event, while the original provocation (burning alive of 59 Hindus by
a Muslim mob without
any provocation) is all
but forgotten. Hence it is that heartrending tales of Kashmiri pundits, who
have suffered far greater atrocities for much longer, hardly ever evokes any
sympathy at all from any political party - not even the BJP. Hence it is that
Hindus can speak as Dalits, Adivasis, Jats, Yadavs, Kurmis, Lingayats, Reddys,
Vanniars and Nairs, but not as Hindus. Hence it is that 12 per cent Muslims,
without uttering a word, can frighten mighty Hindu politicians into rejecting
anyone with Hindu credentials...
In the pre-independence period, a con game was played in the name of nationalism. Only that party, that leader was national (and could speak for the whole country) which was not opposed by the Muslim League. In this reckoning, the Congress was an organization of Hindu banias, but the Communist Party of India was a national organization. After independence, the same game is played in the name of secularism. Only that party, that leader, that programme or proposal is secular which is not opposed by Muslims. The name has changed, participants have changed, but the game remains unchanged. And so does its objective: to keep the Hindus on the defensive.
How history repeats itself! Congress is now saying about BJP whatever Jinnah used to say about Congress in 1940s: that it is a party of Hindu banias, that Muslims can never expect justice from it, that if it ever came to power then Muslims will have to fear for their lives and so on. Again the object is the same: to use Muslims as political pawns to delegitimize and checkmate nationalist sentiments.
Narendra Modi has the power to break this game. Without a single Muslim vote, without making any special or specific gesture to Muslims, he has swept assembly elections, not once, but twice, in
Gujarat. He has demonstrated that if Hindus stand solidly
behind any leader, he does not have to flatter Muslims. This is why he is
regarded as a mortal enemy by most Muslims, all brokers of Muslim votes, and
all parties hankering after the Muslim votebank.
If Modi can replicate at the national level what he has done in
Gujarat, it will
decisively break the stranglehold of Muslim votebanks on Indian politics,
breathe a new self-confidence in Hindu society and force a rethink among Hindu
politicians in non-BJP parties. Muslims will become just one of the many groups
in Indian politics and thus join the national mainstream.
Whether Modi is interested in attempting this feat, whether BJP will give him an opportunity to make such an attempt is, of course, another matter. His sadbhavna yatras have aroused speculation that he, too, may be craving acceptability among circles that want BJP to shed every trace of Hinduness. As to BJP, it does not deserve a single Hindu vote as of now as a party of Hindu nationalism. But that does not affect the position outlined in the earlier passages.
If the BJP really regards itself as a party of Indian nationalism, it should distance itself from those hankering after the 12 per cent votebank and announce Narendra Modi as its prime ministerial candidate for 2014 Lok Sabha election.